Classical and Bayesian Inference for Stress-Strength Reliabilityof Shifted Geometric Lifetimes under Unified Hybrid Censoring

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66279/6248yr43

Keywords:

Bayesian Inference, Shifted Geometric Lifetimes, Hybrid Censoring, Maximum Likelihood Estimation, Jeffreys Prior

Abstract

Stress-strength reliability inference is developed for independent shifted geometric strength and stress lifetimes observed under unified hybrid censoring schemes (UHCSs). The reliability R=P(X > Y) is appropriate for experiments in which lifetime is recorded as a number of operating cycles, inspections, or trials. Under the UHCS the likelihood reduces to a kernel in the number of observed failures and the total discrete exposure, which yields closed-form maximum likelihood estimators of the geometric parameters and, by invariance, of ????. Wald and delta-method intervals are derived from the observed Fisher information, a conservative conditional beta interval is obtained from beta tails with a Bonferroni adjustment, and an exact procedure based on inversion of the UHCS sampling distribution is outlined. Bayesian inference under the Jeffreys prior of the shifted geometric model and under the uniform prior leads to beta posteriors for the parameters and to Monte Carlo evaluation of the posterior of R. A parametric bootstrap percentile interval is also considered. A pilot Monte Carlo study with PX=0.05, PY =0.10, , and sample sizes between 250 and 600 compares bias, mean squared error, coverage probability, and average interval length. The maximum likelihood and Jeffreys estimators are nearly indistinguishable, and the uniform prior adds a small bias. The conditional beta interval attains coverage of at least 0.995 with intervals about 1.6 times longer, whereas the delta-method, Jeffreys credible, and bootstrap intervals have coverage within Monte Carlo error of 0.95. Accelerated capacitor lifetimes converted to inspection cycles illustrate the methods. The estimate of R remains between 0.656 and 0.677 as the cycle width varies from 1 to 200 hours, while the per-cycle parameters change by a factor of about 180.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • M. O. Mohamed, Zagazig University, Egyptian Chinese University

    Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. and 

    Faculty of Computers and Information Systems, Egyptian Chinese University, Nasr City, Egypt.

  • Ziad M. Mahmoud, Eslsca University

    School of Computing and Digital Technology, Eslsca University, Giza, Egypt

  • Okechukwu J. Obulezi, Nnamdi Azikiwe University

    Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.O. Box 5025 Awka, Nigeria.

References

[1] S. Kotz, Y. Lumelskii, and M. Pensky, The Stress-Strength Model and Its Generalizations: Theory and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812564511

[2] M. O. Mohamed, “Inference for reliability and stress-strength for geometric distribution,” Sylwan, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 281–289, 2015.

[3] M. K. Shakhatreh, “Bayesian inference on stress–strength reliability with geometric distributions,” Symmetry, vol. 17, no. 10, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17101723

[4] M. Nadar and F. Kızılaslan, “Classical and Bayesian estimation of p(x < y) using upper record values from Kumaraswamy’s distribution,” Statistical Papers, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 751–783, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-013-0526-x

[5] R. Kumari, K. K. Mahajan, and S. Arora, “Bayesian estimation of stress-strength reliability using upper record values from generalised inverted exponential distribution,” International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 882–894, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.4-070

[6] Q. J. Azhad, M. Arshad, and N. Khandelwal, “Statistical inference of reliability in multicomponent stress strength model for Pareto distribution based on upper record values,” International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 319–334, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2021.1891496

[7] R. M. Juvairiyya and P. Anilkumar, “Estimation of stress-strength reliability for the Pareto distribution based on upper record values,” Statistica, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 397–409, 2018.

[8] A. Pak, M. Raqab, M. R. Mahmoudi, S. S. Band, and A. Mosavi, “Estimation of stress-strength reliability r=p(x>y) based on weibull record data in the presence of inter-record times,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 2130–2144, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.07.025

[9] M. O. Mohamed, “Reliability with stress-strength for Poisson-exponential distribution,” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4915–4919, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2015.4459

[10] B. Elkalzah, M. O. Mohamed, K. Elsharkawy, E. S. Osman, A. Aldukeel, and G. A. Marei, “Classical and bayesian estimation of stress strength reliability under the discrete alpha-power weibull distribution with incomplete and record data: Application to high-voltage capacitors,” AIMS Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 6374–6399, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2026263

[11] M. A. Elgawad, M. Alawady, H. Barakat, G. Mansour, I. Husseiny, S. A. Alyami, A. F. Hashem, and M. Mohamed, “Bivariate power lomax sarmanov distribution: Statistical properties, reliability measures, and parameter estimation,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 113, pp. 593–610, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.074

[12] J. F. Lawless, Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Wiley & Sons, 2 ed., 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118033005

[13] W. Q. Meeker and L. Escobar, Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. Wiley Series in Probability & Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, 1998.

[14] G. Casella and R. Berger, Statistical Inference. Duxbury advanced series in statistics and decision sciences, Thomson Learning, 2002.

[15] N. Balakrishnan, A. Rasouli, and N. Sanjari Farsipour, “Exact likelihood inference based on an unified hybrid censored sample from the exponential distribution,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 475–488, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650601158336

[16] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. No. v. 1 in An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-1958-1700125

[17] N. Johnson, A. Kemp, and S. Kotz, Univariate Discrete Distributions. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471715816

[18] M. O. Mohamed, “Estimation of R for geometric distribution under lower record values,” Journal of Applied Research and Technology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 368–375, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.24486736e.2020.18.6.1354

[19] D. Kumar, “Explicit expressions and statistical inference of generalized Rayleigh distribution based on lower record values,” Mathematical Methods of Statistics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 225–241, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530715030035

[20] A. Pak and S. Dey, “Statistical inference for the power lindley model based on record values and inter-record times,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 347, pp. 156–172, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.08.012

[21] F. Louzada-Neto, V. G. Cancho, and G. D. C. Barriga, “The Poisson–exponential distribution: a Bayesian approach,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1239–1248, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2010.491862

[22] M. O. Mohamed, N. A. Hassan, and N. Abdelrahman, “Discrete alpha-power weibull distribution: Properties and application,” International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1305–1317, 2022.

[23] T. M. Therneau, T. Lumley, E. Atkinson, and C. Crowson, “survival: Survival analysis,” 2008. R package version 2.34.

Downloads

Published

25-10-2026

How to Cite

Classical and Bayesian Inference for Stress-Strength Reliabilityof Shifted Geometric Lifetimes under Unified Hybrid Censoring. (2026). Mathematical Applications and Statistical Rigor (MASR), 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.66279/6248yr43

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.