Experimental validation and techno-economic assessment of façade-applied photovoltaics for nearly zero-energy building conversion in a Mediterranean climate: A Case Study of the Faculty of Engineering, Damanhur University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66279/tq15py83Keywords:
açade-applied photovoltaics, Building-integrated photovoltaics, Nearly zero-energy buildings, Solar-radiation screening, Techno-economic assessmentAbstract
This study develops an experimentally supported framework for assessing façade-applied photovoltaic (PV) systems as a strategy for reducing grid-electricity demand and evaluating building energy performance in a Mediterranean educational building. The Faculty of Engineering, Damanhour University, Egypt, is considered as the sole case study. The methodology integrates localized field electrical testing, a weather-adjusted July–August electrical time series, façade specific annual solar-radiation screening, controlled DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus simulations, and a transparent module-cost economic assessment. A field test conducted on 2 July 2026 recorded a mean current of 2.72 A and peak current of 3.57 A, corresponding to mean and peak power outputs of 41.42 and 54.33 W for the conventional PV test. A separate two-point BIPV test recorded a mean current of 8.05 A and mean power of 89.79 W. The weather-adjusted dataset covers 1 July–12 August 2026 at 30-minute intervals for JSM-195SP and JS-190W-Special modules installed at 90° and 30°. Annual solar-radiation screening identified Elevation 1 as the most favorable vertical façade, receiving 1,141.2 kWh/m²·year, while the roof received 1,726.8 kWh/m²·year. The annual building assessment uses 8,760-hour DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus simulations with a common modeled PV façade allocation of 1,123.20 m². A baseline and four PV scenarios were evaluated. JSM-195SP at 30° generated 229,119.60 kWh/year and reduced net grid electricity consumption by 217,663.62 kWh/year (18.93%), reducing Net EUI to 200.70 kWh/m²·year and simulated district cooling by 7.41%. Based on an electricity tariff of 1.95 EGP/kWh and module prices of 6,000 EGP/panel for JSM-195SP and 12,000 EGP/panel for JS-190W-Special, simple module-cost payback periods were 13.03, 100.55, 6.20, and 46.24 years for JSM-195SP at 90°, JS-190W-Special at 90°, JSM-195SP at 30°, and JS-190W-Special at 30°, respectively. Using the 2026 EIB Egypt intermittent-generation factor of 0.498 kgCO₂/kWh, annual avoided operational emissions were estimated at 51.63, 32.20, 108.40, and 70.02 tCO₂/year, respectively. These represent emission reductions and potential carbon-credit quantities subject to applicable certification and additionality requirements. The study does not claim calibrated annual utility validation or whole-building net-zero status; rather, it establishes a reproducible evidence chain linking measured electrical behavior, façade selection, annual simulation, environmental assessment, and investment screening.
Downloads
References
[1] M.M. Ibrahim, M.A. William, A.M. Elharidi, A.A. Hanafy, M.J. Suarez-Lopez, Do solar green roofs contribute to SDGs, fostering energy efficiency and environmental conservation?, Renew. Energy Sustain. Dev. 10 (2024) 258. https://doi.org/10.21622/resd.2024.10.2.924.
[2] J.H. Wesseling, S. Lechtenböhmer, M. Åhman, L.J. Nilsson, E. Worrell, L. Coenen, The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization: Characteristics and implications for future research, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79 (2017) 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.156.
[3] Y. Teng, M. Bai, X. Lin, J. Li, T. Zhang, S. Liu, S. An, L. Xu, P. Wang, S. Han, J. Zhu, J. Zhu, H. Xie, Multi-scale assessment of energy transition and emission patterns in industrial coastal regions, Fuel 406 (2026) 137069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137069.
[4] M.A. Hamied, M.A. Saad, P. García-Regodeseves, J.C. Ríos-Fernández, A novel integrated approach to heat transfer enhancement using baffles and inner fins in helical coil heat exchangers, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 77 (2026) 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.107529.
[5] A.M. Maghrabi, J. Song, C.N. Markides, How can industrial heat decarbonisation be accelerated through energy efficiency?, Appl. Therm. Eng. 233 (2023) 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121092.
[6] N.A. Moharram, A.H. Konsowa, A.I. Shehata, W.M. El-Maghlany, Advances in zero liquid discharge multigeneration plants: A novel approach for integrated power generation, supercritical desalination, and salt production, Energy Convers. Manag. 307 (2024) 118352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118352.
[7] M.M. Ibrahim, M.J. Suarez-Lopez, A.A. Hanafy, M.A. William, Optimizing NZEB performance: A review of design strategies and case studies, Results Eng. 25 (2025) 103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.103950.
[8] H. Setiawan, Towards sustainable energy access: evaluating free online photovoltaic design tools in support of the SDGs, Renew. Energy Sustain. Dev. 12 (2026) 41. https://doi.org/10.21622/resd.2026.12.1.1757.
[9] H.M. Maghrabie, M.A. Abdelkareem, A.H. Al-Alami, M. Ramadan, E. Mushtaha, T. Wilberforce, A.G. Olabi, State-of the-Art Technologies for Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Systems, Buildings 11 (2021) 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090383.
[10] A. Faes, A. Virtuani, H. Quest, L. Maturi, A. Scognamiglio, A. Frontini, A. Schlueter, N. Martin-Chivelet, A. Reinders, C. Ballif, Building-integrated photovoltaics, Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 1 (2025) 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359 025-00059-9.
[11] C. Vassiliades, Optimizing energy efficiency in mediterranean single-family homes: A parametric study of building typology, orientation, and BIPV integration, Renew. Energy 237 (2024) 121541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121541.
[12] D.C. Jordan, C. Deline, M. Deceglie, T.J. Silverman, W. Luo, PV Degradation – Mounting and Temperature, 2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, IEEE, 2019, pp. 0673–0679. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980767.
[13] K.G. Gabrovska-Evstatieva, D.T. Trifonov, B.I. Evstatiev, A Review of the Key Factors Influencing the Performance of Photovoltaic Installations in an Urban Environment, Electricity 6 (2025) 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/electricity6020023.
[14] M. Abdelmagied Hamied, A. Mohamed El-Haridi, W. Mohamed El-Maghlany, A. Ahmed Hanafy, Improving Office Building Energy Performance Using Phase Change Material in Building Envelope, in: 11th Int. Conf. Informatics, Environ. Energy Appl., ACM, 2022, pp. 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533254.3533264.
[15] O. Irulegi, A. Ruiz-Pardo, A. Serra, J.M. Salmerón, R. Vega, Retrofit strategies towards Net Zero Energy Educational Buildings: A case study at the University of the Basque Country, Energy Build. 144 (2017) 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.030.
[16] M. Krarti, P. Ihm, Evaluation of net-zero energy residential buildings in the MENA region, Sustain. Cities Soc. 22 (2016) 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.007.
[17] S. Albadry, K. Tarabieh, H. Sewilam, Achieving Net Zero-Energy Buildings through Retrofitting Existing Residential Buildings Using PV Panels, Energy Procedia 115 (2017) 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.018.
[18] S. Attia, A. Evrard, E. Gratia, Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector, Appl. Energy 94 (2012) 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.065.
[19] H.S.M. Shahin, Adaptive building envelopes of multistory buildings as an example of high performance building skins, Alexandria Eng. J. 58 (2019) 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.11.013.
[20] S. Yang, A. Cannavale, A. Di Carlo, D. Prasad, A. Sproul, F. Fiorito, Performance assessment of BIPV/T double-skin façade for various climate zones in Australia: Effects on energy consumption, Sol. Energy 199 (2020) 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.044.
[21] S. Sarihi, F. Mehdizadeh Saradj, M. Faizi, A Critical Review of Façade Retrofit Measures for Minimizing Heating and Cooling Demand in Existing Buildings, Sustain. Cities Soc. 64 (2021) 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.12.007.
[22] A. Dutta, A. Samanta, Reducing cooling load of buildings in the tropical climate through window glazing: A model to model comparison, J. Build. Eng. 15 (2018) 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.005.
[23] A. Fathalian, H. Kargarsharifabad, Actual validation of energy simulation and investigation of energy management strategies (Case Study: An office building in Semnan, Iran), Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 12 (2018) 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2018.06.007.
[24] M.M. Ibrahim, M.A. William, A.A. Hanafy, M.F. Moussa, M.J. Suarez-Lopez, Multi-pronged strategies for enhancing building envelopes toward nearly-zero energy in hot climatic regions, Eng. Res. Express 6 (2024) 045532. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad898a.
[25] A. Buonomano, G. De Luca, U. Montanaro, A. Palombo, Innovative technologies for NZEBs: An energy and economic analysis tool and a case study of a non-residential building for the Mediterranean climate, Energy Build. 121 (2016) 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.037.
[26] S. Bayoumi, N.A. Moharram, A.I. Shehata, M.M. Imam, W.M. El-Maghlany, A multi-criteria performance assessment of concentrated solar power plants for site and technology selection in Egypt, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21 (2024) 2989–3004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05114-1.
[27] BIPV | Jet-Solar, (n.d.). https://www.jet-solar.com/en/bipv (accessed May 3, 2026).
[28] M. Elmnifi, D.T. Aleksandrovna, A.F.A. Fadiel, A.I. Shehata, N.A. Moharram, A.A. Taha, Unlocking hybrid solar efficiency: Experimental integration of aluminum foam fins and nanofluids in PVT collectors, Results Eng. 29 (2026) 108751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108751.
[29] M. El Hadi Attia, A. Khelifa, A.E. Kabeel, M. Fayed, W.M. El-Maghlany, N.A. Moharram, A novel PVT system integrated with semicircular fins: CFD-based analysis of heat dissipation and energy efficiency, Appl. Therm. Eng. 279 (2025) 127551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127551.
[30] M.A. William, M.J. Suárez-López, S. Soutullo, A.A. Hanafy, Techno-economic evaluation of building envelope solutions in hot arid climate: A case study of educational building, Energy Reports 7 (2021) 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2021.07.098.
[31] H. Gholami, H.N. Røstvik, D. Müller-Eie, Holistic economic analysis of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) system: Case studies evaluation, Energy Build. 203 (2019) 109461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109461.
[32] U. Nations, The 17 Goals | Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2023). https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
[33] A. Abdallah, M.A. William, N.A. Moharram, I.F. Zidane, Wake-resolved 3D CFD analysis of a J-blade vertical axis wind turbine: startup optimization and tip-speed trade-offs, Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J. 77 (2026) 102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2026.102364.
[34] N.A. Moharram, A.H. Konsowa, A.I. Shehata, W.M. El-Maghlany, Sustainable seascapes: An in-depth analysis of multigeneration plants utilizing supercritical zero liquid discharge desalination and a combined cycle power plant, Alexandria Eng. J. 118 (2025) 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.091.
[35] S. Pless, P. Torcellini, Net-Zero Energy Buildings: A Classification System Based on Renewable Energy Supply Options, NREL/TP-550-44586, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2172/983417.
[36] Global Solar Atlas, (n.d.). https://globalsolaratlas.info/ (accessed May 3, 2026).
[37] Weather Alexandria - meteoblue, (n.d.). https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/week/alexandria_egypt_361058 (accessed May 3, 2026).
[38] J. Águila-León, C. Vargas-Salgado, D. Díaz-Bello, C. Montagud-Montalvá, Optimizing photovoltaic systems: A meta optimization approach for improving MPPT controllers, Renew. Energy 230 (2024) 120892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120892.
[39] Q. Yu, S. Chan, K. Chen, B. Zhao, X. Ren, G. Pei, Numerical and experimental study of a novel vacuum photovoltaic/thermal collector for efficient solar energy harvesting, Appl. Therm. Eng. 236 (2024) 121580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121580.
[40] W.M. El-Maghlany, M.E.H. Attia, A.E. Kabeel, M.A. Elazab, A. Hidouri, N.A. Moharram, Comparative experimental study on the performance of single-slope, hemispherical, and conical solar stills, Arch. Thermodyn. (2025) 187–187. https://doi.org/10.24425/ather.2025.156590.
[41] W.S. Ebhota, P.Y. Tabakov, Influence of photovoltaic cell technologies and elevated temperature on photovoltaic system performance, Ain Shams Eng. J. 14 (2023) 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101984.
[42] J. Appelbaum, A. Peled, A. Aronescu, Shadow Analysis of Photovoltaic Systems Deployed Near Obscuring Walls, Energies 18 (2025) 4839. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184839.
[43] H. Gholami, H. Nils Røstvik, N. Manoj Kumar, S.S. Chopra, Lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) of tailor-made building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) façade: Solsmaragden case study in Norway, Sol. Energy 211 (2020) 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.087.
[44] A. Perrelli, E. Sodré, V. Silva, A. Santos, Maximizing Returns and Minimizing Risks in Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: A Stochastic Discounted Cash Flow Analysis of Wind and Photovoltaic Systems in Brazil, Energies 16 (2023) 6833. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196833.
[45] N.A. Moharram, S. Bayoumi, A.A. Hanafy, W.M. El-Maghlany, Techno-economic analysis of a combined concentrated solar power and water desalination plant, Energy Convers. Manag. 228 (2021) 113629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113629.
[46] IEA, Energy Efficiency 2023, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy efficiency-2023.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
NA
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advanced Multidisciplinary Engineering Journal (AMEJ) seeks to publish the most influential papers that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected articles must present new and widely significant data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and the general public through publication in a reputable scientific journal.
Advanced Multidisciplinary Engineering Journal (AMEJ) content is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This means that content is freely available to all readers upon publication, and content is published as soon as production is complete.
SIRG Publisher
